EO/IR systems · Shenzhen, China WhatsApp +86 158 1370 4981

Airborne payloads

UAV gimbal cameras
for airborne ISR.

Select a stabilized airborne payload around platform mass, target detail, endurance and the number of sensing channels that must share one line of sight.

OEM integrationCurrent specificationsQuotation support
Airborne payloads / PT130 Airborne payloads / PT130 product view

Selection criteria

Start with the mission envelope.

Use the same requirement boundary for every candidate, then compare documented evidence rather than headline numbers.

01

Platform SWaP

Compare complete installed mass, swept envelope, startup current and continuous power against the airframe allowance.

02

Image detail

Match detector, lens and field of view to the smallest feature that must be recognized at the working distance.

03

Integration

Confirm mount pattern, connector set, control protocol, video stream and behaviour after link loss.

Supplier evaluation

Shortlisting a UAV gimbal camera supplier?

Compare installed mass, optics, power and interfaces across the six configurations, then request current data sheets and a quotation for the shortlisted format.

Technical reading

Build the evidence package.

Use the engineering guide to normalize claims across optics, stabilization, installed mass, power and interfaces before issuing a technical RFQ.

Engineering brief

Choosing an airborne gimbal

A practical way to separate airframe limits, optical reach and stabilization claims before shortlisting a payload.

Formats
Six airborne configurations
Mass band
190 g to 1.2 kg installed
Channels
Visible, thermal and laser
Next step
Matched imagery and ICD review
Brief 01PT130
PT130 Long-range UAV gimbal camera
PT13030× optical · 2 km · ≤1.1 kg

01 Engineering brief

Start with the aircraft, then the image

A UAV gimbal camera is not selected from a catalogue in isolation. It becomes part of an aircraft whose endurance, centre of gravity, vibration environment and data link are already constrained. The productive sequence is therefore to fix the platform allowance first, then define the image that the mission must deliver, and only then compare optical and stabilization configurations. A payload that looks impressive on a specification sheet can still be the wrong choice if its installed mass, swept volume or startup current falls outside the airframe envelope.

Begin with four numbers: maximum payload mass with the isolation mount and harness, available electrical power at peak and continuous load, the volume swept by the gimbal through its full travel, and the data rate the link can sustain without affecting flight control. These are integration limits, not marketing preferences. Once they are written down, the six airborne formats in this range can be assessed on a common basis instead of by headline zoom or detector resolution alone.

Brief 02PD70
PD70 Compact thermal drone gimbal
PD70≤250 g · 640×512 · 3-axis

02 Engineering brief

The six formats serve different jobs

The PV40 is a visible-light micro pod intended for FPV interceptors and other very small airframes. Its two-axis stabilization, 190 g class mass and 16 mm lens prioritise response and low payload penalty. The PV40DYT keeps a similar visible-light core but adapts the enclosure and control envelope for high-speed rocket airframes, including a 200 m/s flight-speed statement. Neither should be treated as a general-purpose ISR turret.

The PD70 moves into a 250 g three-axis class while adding a 640 × 512 thermal channel and a 4K visible sensor. It is a natural starting point for small UAVs that need day and night awareness without a large payload bay. The PD80B has a different purpose: its 25 mm thermal optic and wide visible camera are arranged for terminal tracking from a loitering munition, where the target is close and the airframe may not return.

At the upper end, PT95B combines 4K visible imaging, thermal vision and a 1.5 km laser rangefinder in a 700 g three-axis pod. PT130 extends optical reach with a 30× visible zoom, a 25 or 35 mm thermal lens and a 2 km rangefinder in a 1.1 kg package. The choice between them is usually a trade between endurance and the smallest target detail that must be recognised at the working distance.

Brief 03PT95B
PT95B Tri-sensor UAV gimbal camera
PT95B≤700 g · 640×512 · 1.5 km

03 Engineering brief

Read the optical chain as one system

Field of view, focal length, detector format and display magnification must be evaluated together. A 4K sensor does not guarantee more usable detail if the lens projects a wide scene onto a small portion of the array. Conversely, a lower-resolution sensor with a longer lens can put more pixels on a distant vehicle. The useful calculation is pixels across the target at the expected slant range, followed by an honest allowance for atmospheric contrast, platform motion and the operator's display.

Thermal selection adds another layer. Detector resolution, pixel pitch, lens focal length and thermal contrast determine whether a person or vehicle separates from the background. A narrow thermal field of view improves pixel coverage but makes it harder to find a target that is not already cued. Wide-area search and long-range identification therefore pull in opposite directions. Tri-sensor payloads solve part of that problem by letting the operator search with a wider channel and confirm with a narrow one, but they also increase mass, power and calibration complexity.

Laser rangefinders should be specified with their measurement range, wavelength, beam divergence, update rate and eye-safety class. A single headline range does not describe performance against small, low-reflectivity targets or in poor visibility. Ask for the target reflectivity and atmospheric assumptions behind the number, and check whether the laser shares a boresight with the imaging channels. A range that is not aligned with the optical line of sight creates errors during target location.

Brief 04PV40
PV40 FPV counter-UAV gimbal camera
PV40≤190 g · 0.5 km person · 2-axis

04 Engineering brief

Stabilization is a measured behaviour

Two-axis and three-axis are architecture labels, not performance grades. What matters is the residual angular motion at the focal length the mission will actually use, the settling time after a commanded slew, and the ability to recover after a manoeuvre or temporary loss of track. A narrow zoom setting magnifies any residual motion, so a stabilization claim made at wide angle may tell the operator very little about the image at 30× zoom.

The airframe is part of the control problem. Motor vibration, propeller harmonics, hard mounts and flexible airframes can all inject disturbance that no gimbal can completely remove. The isolation mount, centre of gravity and cable service loop therefore belong in the same review as the gimbal controller. Request a vibration profile and a matched image sequence rather than a single still frame. For a compact explanation of the architectural trade, read the two-axis versus three-axis integration guide.

Brief 05PD80B
PD80B Loitering munition tracking pod
PD80B≤285 g · Vehicle / UAV · 2-axis

05 Engineering brief

Mechanical, power and data checks

Obtain a drawing that shows the complete installed envelope, including the damper, connectors and the space required for cable movement. Check the mounting pattern against the airframe hard points and confirm that the gimbal can reach its stated travel without striking the fuselage, landing gear or antenna. The centre of gravity should be checked in the stowed and deployed positions. A payload that balances on the bench may still change the aircraft's handling when it is extended into the airflow.

Power figures need the same discipline. Separate startup, steady-state, peak-slew and heater consumption where applicable. Confirm the input voltage range against the actual battery or converter, and check whether the airframe can supply inrush current without disturbing the flight controller. For data, identify the physical connector, video format, control protocol, update rate and expected behaviour after link loss. If the payload supports onboard tracking, define whether track coordinates, bounding boxes or compressed video cross the interface, and at what rate.

Do not accept “Ethernet” or “serial” as a complete interface answer. Ask for the connector pinout, protocol version, IP addressing assumptions, timestamp behaviour and the format of any metadata. These details determine whether integration takes days or months. The resource library is the place to request current drawings and interface information for the shortlisted model.

Brief 06PV40DYT
PV40DYT High-speed UAV gimbal camera
PV40DYT200 m/s · ≤220 g · 1080p60

06 Engineering brief

Evidence to request before placing an order

A credible evaluation package should include matched visible and thermal frames at defined distances, a recorded stabilization sequence at representative zoom, power measurements at startup and continuous load, and a mechanical drawing with the installed envelope. If laser ranging is part of the requirement, ask for a range test against targets of stated size and reflectivity. If tracking is relevant, request a sequence that includes target occlusion, reacquisition and a second target entering the field.

Record the firmware revision, test date, mounting arrangement and environmental conditions with every item. That turns a demonstration into evidence that can be compared across suppliers. It also gives the integration team a baseline for acceptance testing after the payload is installed on the aircraft. A short bench test and a documented flight test are more useful than an unlabelled highlight video.

Finally, map the requirement to one primary format and one fallback. The primary choice should meet the mission with margin; the fallback should protect schedule if mass, power or delivery changes. The UAV gimbal camera specification guide provides a normalized comparison method, and the engineering inquiry form can be used to send the platform envelope for a configuration review.

Questions from integration teams

Frequently asked questions

01

Is a three-axis gimbal always better than a two-axis gimbal?

No. Three axes can correct an additional disturbance direction, but the right choice depends on aircraft motion, field of view, mass and mission duration. A well-integrated two-axis pod can be preferable when the airframe cannot afford the extra mass or volume. Compare residual image motion at the intended zoom, not the axis count alone.

02

Can one payload cover both wide-area search and long-range identification?

Often only with a compromise. A zoom or multi-sensor payload can search wide and confirm narrow, but the wide channel may have less target detail and the narrow channel may be harder to point without cueing. Define the search field, the recognition distance and the time available before deciding whether one payload or a two-payload architecture is more efficient.

03

What is the most common integration omission?

Cable and connector clearance is a frequent issue. The gimbal may fit in the stowed position yet pull a harness tight at full travel. Check the swept volume with the actual connector bodies and service loop. Power inrush and video latency are the next most common surprises.

04

How should a first flight test be structured?

Start with a restrained hover or low-speed sortie, record baseline vibration and power, then repeat a fixed set of slow and fast slews. Compare the recorded image against the bench baseline. Only after those checks should the team expand the flight envelope or test tracking at long range.

OEM and programme support

Request a configuration review.

Share the platform, target set, range and interface constraints. We will map the relevant format and current documentation.

WhatsAppEngineering chat